Update 9/10/20: Meghan Markle And Prince Harry Receive Apology Over Drone Photos Of Archie
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have received an apology from a photo agency after they used a drone to take pictures of the couple's one-year-old son Archie playing in their garden.
In July, it was confirmed that the royal couple were commencing legal action in Meghan's home state of California over what they deemed 'an invasion of privacy'.
Now, according to the BBC, the photo agency in question, X17, has apologised and reimbursed the couple for legal fees over the photos - which purportedly show Archie playing with his grandmother, Doria Ragland in the garden of a friend's home where they were staying in Los Angeles.
'We apologise to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and their son for the distress we have caused,' the agency said, also agreeing to hand over the photos and destroy any copies. 'We were wrong to offer these photographs and commit to not doing so again.'
Lawyers for Meghan and Harry said: 'This is a successful outcome. All families have a right, protected by law, to feel safe and secure at home.'
Original story 24/07/20: Meghan Markle And Prince Harry Sue Over Photos Of Archie Taken In Their Garden
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have launched legal action over alleged photographs of their son Archie, taken without their permission.
Multiple reports states that legal papers were filed in California - where the family are currently residing in Meghan's native Los Angeles - on Thursday July 23 and claim that photographs were taken of the couple's 14-month-old playing in the garden of their private family home.
Meghan and Harry are fiercely private of their son, and claim the photos violate California's privacy laws, specifically a civil code (1708.8) which states:
A person is liable for physical invasion of privacy when the person knowingly enters onto the land or into the airspace above the land of another person without permission or otherwise commits a trespass in order to capture any type of visual image, sound recording, or other physical impression of the plaintiff engaging in a private, personal, or familial activity and the invasion occurs in a manner that is offensive to a reasonable person.
The couple claim drones and helicopters have been used and also alleged that photographers have cut holes in the family's fence to peer through. The New York Times reports that the Sussexes do not know who has the photos but are seeking to unearth more information.
They are being represented by lawyer Michael Kump, whose previous celebrity clients include Kim Kardashian, Kendall and Kylie Jenner and Sandra Bullock.
In a statement, Kump affirmed, on behalf of his clients, that every individual in California is entitled to a right to privacy, and 'no drones, helicopters, or telephoto lenses can take away that right'.
'The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are filing this lawsuit to protect their young son's right to privacy in their home without intrusion by photographers, and to uncover and stop those who seek to profit from these illegal actions,' he said.
This is the latest in a series of actions the couple have taken to protect their privacy, including an ongoing court case with the Mail On Sunday in which the Duchess of Sussex claims her privacy was breached when the newspaper published a private letter written to her estranged father. The publisher denies the claims and the case is ongoing.
Like this article? Sign up to our newsletter to get more articles like this delivered straight to your inbox.
In need of more inspiration, thoughtful journalism and at-home beauty tips? Subscribe to ELLE's print magazine now and pay just £6 for 6 issues. SUBSCRIBE HERE
You Might Also Like